Legal Opinion
State Corp. Commission v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1927No. 3199PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT
WATSON, J.
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company having withdrawn its station agent at Fulton (now Tune) without having obtained the consent of the State Corporation Commission, the latter cited the former “to show cause why the agency at Fulton, N. M., was discontinued, and why such, agency should not be reinstated.”
The company appeared by counsel and with witneses. Being directed to proceed, it took the position that it was merely present as a defendant, and that it was for the commision to make a case for reinstatement of the service. The commission ruling that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seward v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Public Service Commission v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- Woody v. Denver & Rio Grande R. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
- In re Coal RatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Corporation Com'n v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Denton Bros. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.'s Protest of RatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re Southern Pac. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
- San Juan Coal & Coke Co. v. Santa Fe, S. J. & N. R. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.