Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Meek
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 19, 1933No. 24802PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■BAXLESS, J.
This is an original action in this court on the petition of F. J. Meek for a writ of habeas corpus.
The history of the matter, in substance, is this: Meek was charged in the district court of Osage county, Okla., on two separate counts, with violating the provisions of chapter 24, art. 11, Sess. Laws 1931, regulating the sale of certain types of securities. He was convicted on each charge and sentenced to serve two successive terms in the state penitentiary. Two: appeals were taken, but the convictions were affirmed. Meek v. State (Okla. Cr.) 22 P. (2d) 933; Meek v. State (Okla.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moore v. DempseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Burks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Dancy v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Ikard v. Russell, JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Herndon v. Hammond, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hinkle v. KennySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- State v. BlevinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- Ex Parte BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Lawhorn v. RobertsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- In Re MeekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.