Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tower v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 13, 1959No. C.D. 2100PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Two protests are before us, consolidated for purposes of trial. The merchandise in controversy in both cases is pork meat which was imported from Canada at the port of Buffalo.

The official papers are in evidence.

The entry of protest 257669-K included various meats imported on September 14, 1954, by truck from the plant of Canada Packers, Limited, at West Toronto, Ontario, via Fort Erie, consigned to C. J. Tower & Sons, the importer of record and plaintiff here, at Buffalo. *38The merchandise, liquidation of which was protested, is described in the consumption entry as “6 bxs. — SP…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. United States v. WurzbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Ex Parte Public National Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. United States v. WhitridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Dolliff & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. Close v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API