Holt v. Preload Technology, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OSBORN, Chief Justice.
The injured workman who filed this case against his employer in the trial court seeks to recover damages despite the protection from such suits by the Workers’ Compensation Act. We are asked to declare that statute unconstitutional or create a special exception and permit this suit to continue. We decline the invitation and affirm the trial court’s judgment dismissing the suit.
Arnold Holt was injured when the dome of a 10,000,000 gallon storage tank collapsed beneath him and he fell sixty feet onto the floor of the tank. As a result of the fall, he suffered a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- McKelvy v. BarberTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Lotspeich v. Chance Vought AircraftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- McCulloch v. Fox & Jacobs, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Payne v. Galen Hospital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- González Rivera v. Multiventas y Servicios, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2005
- Mello v. Gouin's Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Daniel E. Arnold v. Gerardo Gonzalez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
- Omar González Rivera Y Otros v. Multiventas Y Servicios, Inc. Y Otros v. Autoridad De Carreteras Y Transportación Y OtrosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2005