Legal Opinion

State v. Meier

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 11, 1996No. C9502-31500; CA A89954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals from convictions for delivery and possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from the trunk of his vehicle. We reverse.

While using a public telephone in a convenience store parking lot, a police officer noticed defendant using an adjacent phone with a notebook open in front of him. In the notebook were written a series of fractions, other numbers, names and telephone numbers. The officer saw a “Vz” followed by “600,” and testified that $600 was the street price for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. LambCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API