Marks v. District Court ex rel. Seventeenth Judicial District
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
LEE, Justice.
In this original proceeding under C.A.R. 21, the petitioners (defendants in the trial court) seek a writ of prohibition restraining the respondent district court from proceeding with a new trial on the single issue of damages rather than a new trial on all issues. The trial court had found that the jury verdict was excessive due to jury bias, prejudice, and passion. The court ordered a new trial on the issue of damages only unless the plaintiff would agree to a lesser award. We issued a rule to show cause why the relief requested by the petitioners should not be granted. We now…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. MoquinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Converse v. ZinkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Kitto v. GilbertColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Sanchez v. District Court Ex Rel. County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Western Food Plan, Inc. v. District Court in and for City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marks v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982