Legal Opinion

Hellums v. Randol

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action for damages. The case is here on writ of error and as a matter of convenience the parties will be referred to by their designation below as plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff sued to recover on account of personal injury and property damage to his automobile occasioned by the alleged negligence of the driver of defendant's truck. The truck was driven against plaintiff's car while in the intersection of two public thoroughfares in Kansas City. Plaintiff was injured and his car damaged. The jury awarded a verdict of $1667, and judgment was so entered for plaintiff. The assignment of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Godfrey Ex Rel. Godfrey v. Kansas City Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  2. Jennemann v. BucherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. State Ex Rel. Higgins v. StantonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Spears v. McCullenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  2. Hood v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Hood v. M. F. A. Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Wagner v. ShellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API