Legal Opinion

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Deane

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 14, 1972No. File 18307PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNaruk, J.

The defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment in the instant title malpractice case based on the Statute of Limitations. In essence, he admits the facts pleaded by the plaintiff, states that only a question of law exists, i.e. the application of the Statute of Limitations to the facts, and asks that the question of law be resolved in his favor.

As has recently been pointed out by our Supreme Court, “[sjummary judgment should be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, affidavits and any other proof submitted show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rathkopf v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Anderson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Briggs v. MerrellConnecticut Superior Court · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Applied Data Processing, Inc. v. Burroughs Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1973
  2. Cooper v. KetoverConnecticut Superior Court · 1978
  3. Hilton of San Juan, Inc. v. LateanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API