Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Stevens

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1890PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Antelope county. Tried below before Norris, J. cited as to the burden of proof of jurisdictional facts: Felton v. Drummond, 21 Neb., 495; State v. Hanlan, 24 Id., 608. . cited on the same point: State v. Weber, 20 Neb., 467; Steinkrause v. Hurlbert, Id., 520; State v. Hanlan, supra.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

On the 11th day of April, 1889, the defendant in error filed with the clerk of the city of Neligh a petition for a *284license to sell malt, spirituous, and vinous liquors in said city. The following is a copy :

“ To the Hon. the Mayor and Oily Council of the City of Neligh, Antelope County, Nebraska: We, the undersigned resident freeholders of the Second ward of the city of Neligh, would respectfully petition that John A. Stevens is a man of respectable character and standing, and a resident of the state of Nebraska, and ask that you grant unto him a license for the sale of malt, spirituous, aud…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. County CommissionersNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Enos v. HanffNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Livingston v. CoreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Rosenberg v. RohrerNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Rosewater v. PinzenschamNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Brown v. LutzNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API