Legal Opinion
Fernandes v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided November 4, 1996No. Civil Action No. 96-2314-KHVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*374 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
On September 25, 1996, the Court sustained defendant’s Motion To Dismiss For Failure To State A Claim For Which Relief May Be Granted Or In The Alternative For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 4) filed August 27,1996. Said motion was unopposed. This matter now comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ Motion For Extension Of Time Within Which To Respond To Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss (Doc. #9) filed September 27, 1996.
D.Kan. Rule 7.1(b) required plaintiffs to file any response to the motion to dismiss within 20 days or (allowing three days because defendant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. Eskenazi, Esko Industries, Inc., Gary Liebman and Jack RibackCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Toney Gomes, Jr. v. Ellen L. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Cessna Finance Corporation v. Bielenberg Masonry Contracting, Inc., Paul BielenbergCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shannon Ex Rel. Shannon v. Pacific Rail Services, L.L.C.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999