Beardsley v. Day
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Daniel Bohrer, from a judgment of the District- Court of Nobles County, Brown, J., decreeing the plaintiff, W.C. Beardsley, to be the owner of the real estate in question, and that defendants George J. Day and Daniel Rohrer have no title to, or interest in it. The facts are all stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
1. On the 1st day of May, 1885, the land in controversy here was mortgaged by the owner, one Baxter, to the plaintiff, to secure the sum of $1,000. Baxter, on May 22, 1887, conveyed the same to one Day, who thereafter, on September 27, 1890, conveyed the same premises by deed of quitclaim to the defendant Rohrer. Prior to the last date plaintiff had foreclosed his mortgage by advertisement, pursuant to a power of sale therein contained, and bid off the premises in his own name at the foreclosure sale on the 1st day of February, 1890. A certificate of sale, executed in due form, under the hand…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. DallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Geary v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Starkweather v. MartinMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Hammond v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Todd v. Union Dime Savings InstitutionNew York Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. LorenzatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Williams v. North Carolina State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Hopkins v. Empire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Hodge v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Thorn v. MayerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.