United States v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, United States of America v. Security-First National Bank
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.
In a certain sense, all forgers are impostors and, similarly, impostors in connection with commercial paper in a broad sense are usually forgers. But in the law merchant they are supposed to be separate people. Thus, if the payee is an impostor, a drawer-drawee (probably more properly considered as a maker) who pays a holder has no recourse on an endorser. If, however, he who signs the name of a payee may be classified as a forger, the drawer-drawee, after paying a subsequent endorser, may still recover his unfortunate payment from the endorser. 1
Of course, it is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National Metropolitan Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cohen v. Lincoln Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Security-First Nat. Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kumaraperu v. Feldsted CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
- United States v. Amy Everston JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- CLIENTS'SEC. FUND v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- First State Bank of Wichita Falls v. Oak Cliff Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, a National Banking Association v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.