Legal Opinion

People v. Piburn

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1934No. Crim. No. 260PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The- defendant was accused in an information filed by the district attorney of San Diego County with the commission of two offenses. The first count of the information alleged a violation by the defendant of section 288 of the Penal Code. The second count alleged a violation by the defendant of the Juvenile Court Law of the state of California. Upon arraignment the defendant entered a plea of not guilty of each of the two offenses charged and a trial of the action was had before the court and a jury selected for the purpose. The jury returned a verdict finding that the defendant was guilty of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. People v. JoriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. O'Donnell (1938)California Supreme Court · 1938
  3. People v. AgullanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. ParisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. People v. O'Donnell (1938)California Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API