Moshier v. City of Romulus
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBashara, P. J.
Plaintiffs brought suit to enjoin the defendant, City of Romulus, from expending public funds for the care and maintenance of a private road located in that city. The trial court after hearing the proofs and argument of the parties, issued a permanent injunction prohibiting further expenditure of public funds. Defendant appeals the court’s order raising both errors of law and findings of fact.
Defendant first argues that plaintiffs do not have standing to maintain this action. The city admits that plaintiffs are taxpayers, but asserts that their interest in the outcome is so financially…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Attorney General ex rel. Cook v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Bates v. City of HastingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- McManus v. City of PetoskeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Laug v. Ottawa County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Bacon v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaminskas v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Little Tree Sushi Bar Inc v. City of Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Little Tree Sushi Bar Inc v. City of Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018