Legal Opinion
NJ MTGE. AND INVEST. CO. v. Dorsey
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 14, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
60 N.J. Super. 299 (1960)
158 A.2d 712
NEW JERSEY MORTGAGE AND INVESTMENT CO., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JOHN W. DORSEY AND CHERRY A. DORSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 15, 1960.
Decided March 14, 1960.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.
Mr. Michael H. Hochman argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Mr. Abraham Miller, attorney).
Mr. William Furst argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.
This is an action on a negotiable promissory note by a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Chapman v. . RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- James Smith Woolen Machine Co. v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901
- Freedley v. FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- CIT Corporation v. PanacCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Albizu v. Ace Enterprises Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Amsterdam v. De PaulNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961