Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wright

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 9, 1991No. 1738PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

This is a workers’ compensation case arising out of an automobile accident. The commissioner found Claimant’s accident arose out of and in the course of employment and awarded benefits. The appellate commission and the circuit court affirmed. The Carrier appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Facts

Danny Joe Wright is a self-employed heating and air conditioning contractor. His brother is among his employees. Wright uses his own truck for business and uses it to carry his tools. It is used primarily for work.

General Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beam v. State Workmen's Compensation FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  2. Sola v. Sunny Slope FarmsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. Baldwin v. Piedmont Woodyards, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. DICKERSON INC. v. McClearyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Smith v. Tangipahoa Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Anderson v. Baptist Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Long v. Injured Workers' Insurance FundCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Whitworth v. Window World, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Stough v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API