Legal Opinion
Ball v. Joy Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1991No. 90-1537PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILTON, District Judge:
The plaintiffs in this consolidated action are eighteen former employees of the defendant Joy Technologies, Inc. and two spouses of former employees. The plaintiffs allege that while employed at the defendant’s corporate facilities in Bluefield, West Virginia, and Bluefield, Virginia, they were wrongfully exposed to and absorbed various toxic chemicals. The district court granted Joy’s motion for summary judgment finding that the plaintiffs had not sustained any physical injury from their exposure to toxic chemicals and having suffered no physical injury, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Long v. City of WeirtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
- Hughes v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
- Jordan v. BeroWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
- Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. CoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Kurt Zehner, Jerry Glenn, John Alvarado, Individually and on Behalf of Similarly Situated Inmates v. Clarence Trigg, Bruce Brown, John SchillingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.