Legal Opinion
Picciano v. McLoughlin
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided July 13, 2010No. 5:07-CV-0781 (GTS/GJD)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER
GLENN T. SUDDABY, District Judge.
Currently before the Court, in this civil rights action filed by Richard J. Picciano (“Plaintiff’) against City of Auburn Police Officer Stephan McLoughlin (“Defendant”), is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 13.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is granted in part and denied in part, such that Plaintiffs false arrest claim is dismissed but his excessive force claim survives Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND
A. Plaintiffs Claims
Generally, liberally construed, Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cooper v. City of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Lozada v. WeilminsterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Lin v. County of MonroeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Mikulec v. Town of CheektowagaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Bentley v. DennisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.