Norton v. Lilley

After the decision in this case in 210 Mass. 214,* the plaintiff filed a third motion to amend his declaration, — two previous ones, as stated in the memorandum of decision filed by the presiding judge, † having been waived by the plaintiff in *240open court. The presiding judge refused to allow the amendment and the plaintiff excepted.

V. E. Barnes, for the plaintiff. J. B. Carroll, W. H. McClintock & J. F. Jennings, for the defendant.

This is the only exception or question before us, though the plaintiff has attempted in his brief to argue matters relating to the correctness of the grounds of the…