Winrod v. Wolters
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sierra County and from an order denying a new trial, and from an order quashing execution. Stanley A. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.—
The defendant Welters commenced .an action against Bullock, Whitmore, Turner et al., as mining partners doing business under the firm name of Harmonía Mining Company. In said suit a writ of attachment issued, and under it the sheriff took into his possession certain property supposed to belong to the copartnership defendants in said action. Thereupon the plaintiffs in this case, under the provisions of section 1206 of the Code of Civil Procedure, gave notice by verified statements of their claims against the defendants in that ease for labor performed within sixty days next before…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hayashi v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Emery v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hammell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Associated Oil Co. v. MullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- North Side Property Owners' Ass'n v. Hillside Memorial ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.