State v. Jackson

Defendant was convicted of burglary. His defense was that he was an innocent bystander and an unintentional participant in the crime. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

An instruction on aiding and abetting was given. Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that the court failed to include in this instruction the element of “knowing” participation and wrongful intent.

The court did instruct that each instruction should be considered in the light of all the others; that the words willfully and maliciously as used in the information mean intentionally or deliberately with a wicked or…