Legal Opinion

Malee Price v. Michael Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 4, 2012No. 11-35126Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Malee Price appeals the district court’s judgment, which affirmed the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits for a period from June 15, 1995, to April 1, 2000. 1 We affirm.(1) Price asserts that the Commissioner and the district court improperly relied upon the law of the case doctrine when they considered this matter. We disagree. Absent an exception, the law of the case doctrine applies. See Old Person v. Brown, 312 F.3d 1036, 1039 (9th Cir. 2002); Jeffries v. Wood, 114 F.3d 1484, 1489 (9th Cir.1997) (en…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tommasetti v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Gordon Stout v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Robbins v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API