Carlyle v. Karns
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
Mr. Carlyle has filed no brief, and made no argument in support of the orders appealed from. These orders might be reversed as a matter of course upon that account. Supreme Court Rule 32, sec. 251.32, Stats. The final order in the proceeding in circuit court was favorable to the commissioner. The appeals from the restraining orders might, therefore, be dismissed as moot. The attorney general urges, however, that we decide the appeal upon its merits because it is of great importance to have an expression from this court to guide trial courts in similar instances. He tells us that the problem…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wisconsin Employment Relations Board v. Allis-Chalmers Workers' Union, Local 248Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Dunn v. Acme Auto & Garage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Burk v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. SchumacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. La Crosse Tribune v. Circuit Court for La Crosse CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Milwaukee Professional Firefighters, Local 215 v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Racine v. J-T Enterprises of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Mueller v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.