Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Edwards v. Geico Indemnity Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 2015No. 14-606Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partConery, J.

hi concur in the majority’s decision to reverse the judgment against GEICO Indemnity Company and its insured, Patricia Breaux. I dissent as to the amount of general monetary damages for each plaintiff set by the majority.

Edwards and Wardsworth are brothers. They were rear ended but neither reported any injuries at the scene of this relatively minor automobile collision. The accident happened on February 24, 2012. Edwards reported to the E.R. two days after the accident on February 26, 2012, and Wardsworth three days later on February 29, 2012. Neither was diagnosed with a serious injury and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hall v. Excelsior Steam Laundry Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Day v. AllenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Cochran v. Pelican Well Tool & Supply Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Matthews v. Consolidated Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API