Legal Opinion

Van Bokkelen v. Tinges

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 2, 1882PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

Margaret E. Morton by the residuary clause of her will devised all the residue of her estate to trustees, in trust for the benefit of the children and descendants of her half-sister. By its terms this trust was to continue until the cestuis gue trust severally attained the age of tAventy-one years, and it is admitted the trust is still continuing. And in order to facilitate the management and division of the property, she gave the trustees poAver “to sell and dispose of any part or all of her estate” “at their discretion, and, if the trust continues, to re-invest the proceeds on the same…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Noel v. NoelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  2. Killen v. HouserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Reeside v. Annex Building Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  4. Rosenthal v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. Keister v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API