Legal Opinion
City of San Antonio v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 19, 1930No. 8395PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This appeal involves the validity of the ordinance of the city of San Antonio designed to regulate the location, construction, and operation of drive-in gasoline filling stations. In the judgment here appealed from, the controlling sections of said ordinance were held to be unconstitutional and void. The trial court, specifically condemned subdivision (B), § 7, of the Ordinance of January 23, 1919, as amended on September 26, 1927, notwithstanding this court had previously, in the case of City of San Antonio v. Robt. Thompson & Co., 23 S.W.(2d) 796, 799, upheld the validity of said…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Standard Oil Co. v. City of MarysvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Davis v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- City of Fort Worth v. Gulf Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Swain v. Board of Adjustment of City of Univ. ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- City of Fort Worth v. Gulf Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Edge v. City of BellaireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Davis v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.