Legal Opinion

City of Fort Worth v. Gulf Refining Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1935No. 5981PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This case is before us by writ of error. It involves the validity of an ordinance of the plaintiff in error providing an annual charge of $24 for the right to operate each gasoline filling station in the city.

The trial court sustained the ordinance, and denied the injunction prayed for, but the Court of Civil Appeals held it -"void, reversed the trial court’s judgment, and entered "a decree in favor of defendants in error. (36 S. W. (2d) 285). The case was first assigned to the Commission of Appeals, which, upon hearing, held the ordinance valid and recommended the reversal of the judgment of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Brown v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Atkins v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Scott v. Champion Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Davis v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. v. LewellenTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hurt v. CooperTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Gulf Ins. Co. v. James, St. Treas.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. City of Houston v. Harris County Outdoor Advertising Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Emerson College v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API