Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re McNeil-PPC, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 31, 2009No. 2008-1546Published

1DissentDyk, Circuit Judge

The decision of the Board of Patent Appeals (“Board”) clearly states on its face that it was “Decided: May 30, 2008.” Because McNeil did not appeal until August 1, 2008, two days after the regulatory period for review from a decision of May 30, 2008, in my view this appeal was untimely filed and is beyond our jurisdiction to review. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s contrary conclusion.

The jurisdiction of this court is statutorily limited by the timeliness regulations of the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). The statute provides: “When an appeal is taken to the United States Court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Application of Arthur L. ReeseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. Burton v. BentleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API