Legal Opinion

State v. Hatfield

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2018No. S-16-893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

INTRODUCTION

On intermediate appeal from county court, the district court vacated Steven J. Hatfield's conviction for driving under the influence (DUI) and granted him a new trial after determining that his warrantless blood draw was unlawful and inadmissible in light of Birchfield v. North Dakota . Because we determine that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies, we sustain the State's exception. And because we are not prevented from affecting the district court's decision when it sits as an appellate court, we reverse the order and remand the cause for further proceedings…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. State v. ThalkenNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. HillNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. TylerNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. HoerleNebraska Supreme Court · 2017

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HoodNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. KruseNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. HatfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State v. EarithNebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. State v. EllwangerNebraska Court of Appeals · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API