Legal Opinion

Howard v. Rumble

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 7, 1908No. 1045, 1046PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Money rule, from city court of Forsyth — Judge Clark. January 28, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

This is a contest by money rule between Howard and Rumble, over the proceeds of a horse and mule sold by the sheriff under a mortgage foreclosure in favor of Howard against a common debtor of his and Rumble’s. Rumble had a common-law fi. fa. issued and recorded in 1901. On February 28, 1905, Howard sold to the defendant in fi. fa. the horse referred to, and, to secure the purchase-money represented in a note for $125, took a mortgage on it and on the mule. In the mortgage was a provision: “If said horse is returned in good fix every way, fat and without blemish, at maturity of note, with $25…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conder v. Holleman & BallardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Cofer v. BensonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Scott, Carhart, & Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
  4. Rasin v. Swann, Stewart & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fountain v. FountainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  2. Luke v. CasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API