Howard v. Rumble
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Money rule, from city court of Forsyth — Judge Clark. January 28, 1908.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
This is a contest by money rule between Howard and Rumble, over the proceeds of a horse and mule sold by the sheriff under a mortgage foreclosure in favor of Howard against a common debtor of his and Rumble’s. Rumble had a common-law fi. fa. issued and recorded in 1901. On February 28, 1905, Howard sold to the defendant in fi. fa. the horse referred to, and, to secure the purchase-money represented in a note for $125, took a mortgage on it and on the mule. In the mortgage was a provision: “If said horse is returned in good fix every way, fat and without blemish, at maturity of note, with $25…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Conder v. Holleman & BallardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Cofer v. BensonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Scott, Carhart, & Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
- Rasin v. Swann, Stewart & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1888
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fountain v. FountainCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Luke v. CasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909