Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Caldwell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 25, 1937No. 26792PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
In effect, this is an action for deceit to recover the sum of $3,500 as damages claimed by plaintiff for the alleged fraudulent acts of the defendant. For convenience the parties will be designated as they appeared in the court below-.
Mrs. Caldwell, plaintiff, had on deposit in a Bank in Mangum, Okla., the sum of $3,500. Defendant, Johnson, was a druggist in Mangum and plaintiff traded at his store. Defendant had invested $72,000 in the Century Building & Loan Association of Dallas, Tex., $42,000 in stock of the Amarillo Building & Loan Association, and $15,000 in stock of the Chieftain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wingate v. RenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Cooper v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Pevehouse v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Henry v. CollierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Silk v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- P.E.A.C.E. Corp. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Roberts v. Wells Fargo AG Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- James F. Barnett v. Life Insurance Company of the SouthwestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Derakhshan v. TizzioCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.