Legal Opinion

Von Holt v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided July 1, 2009No. CA CR 08-1254Published

1Opinion of the Court

WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge.

liThis is a no-merit appeal from the revocation of appellant Frankie Von Holt’s suspended sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Rule 4-3(k)(1) of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, Holt’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that an appeal in this matter would be wholly without merit. Holt was provided a copy of his counsel’s no-merit brief and was notified of his right to file a list of points on appeal within thirty days. He declined to file any points. The State did not file…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Barbee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Eads v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API