Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1988No. Appeal No. 39 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

Mother Goose Day Care Center, Inc. (Mother Goose) and Addie McFarland, its Vice President and General Manager, appeal from an order of the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) which affirmed orders of DPWs Deputy Secretary of Planning, Policy and Evaluation which refused to renew certificates of compliance for Mother Gooses childrens’ day care centers in Morrisville and Penndel and imposed a civil penalty upon Mother Goose for failure to comply with Section 23.1 of the Child Protective Services Law, Act of July 1,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Pine Haven Residential Care Home v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Gomez v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. KC Equities v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Aa to Zz Childcare and Learning Ctr. v. DHSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Celeste Learning Center v. DHSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API