Legal Opinion · Dissent

Morris v. South Carolina State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 13, 1975No. 20011Published

1DissentBussey, Justice

(dissenting) :

This case does not involve, I think, any complex issue of statutory construction, strict or otherwise. Under the settled law of this State governmental entities have no business except “official business” and therefore the statu*376tory phrase “while in and about the official business of such governmental entity” merely imposes the requirement that the employee be about the business of the employer. If such language had been omitted I think the meaning and effect thereof would have to be implied.

The purpose of code section 10-2623 is to put governmental entities, subject to certain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  2. Carroll v. Beard-Laney, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. League v. National Surety CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API