Legal Opinion

Taylor v. RAMSAY-GERDING CONSTRUCTION CO.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 2010No. 015188; A127434PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Defendant ChemRex seeks reconsideration of our opinion on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, 233 Or App 272, 226 P3d 45 (2010), in which we affirmed the jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiffs on their breach of warranty claim. We allow reconsideration to address two contentions and adhere to our opinion as modified by the following discussion.

Defendant first asks that we address its second argument in its first assignment of error, in which it asserted that it was entitled to a directed verdict on plaintiffs’ breach of warranty claim because the alleged representations of defendant’s agent,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. ParkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Charles v. PalomoOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Taylor v. Ramsay-Gerding Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Taylor v. Ramsay-Gerding Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WhitmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Migis v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. OhottoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. Delgado v. Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. AS 2014-11 5W LLC v. Caplan Landlord, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API