People v. Holland
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The appeal should be dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division (74 AD3d 520 [1st Dept 2010]) was not on the law alone within the meaning of CPL 450.90 (2) (a).*
Here, the Appellate Division’s reversal of Supreme Court’s order granting suppression, while termed “on the law,” was actually predicated upon a differing view concerning the issue of attenuation, which is a mixed question of law and fact. A reversal *842on a mixed question typically does not meet the requisites of CPL 450.90 (2) (a) (see People v Mayorga, 64 NY2d 864, 865 [1985]…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. MayorgaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. HintonNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. WallgrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Darryl C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Darryl C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. HollandNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- The Matter of Jamal S v. Presentment AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.