Legal Opinion

People v. Holland

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 2011No. 236PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The appeal should be dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division (74 AD3d 520 [1st Dept 2010]) was not on the law alone within the meaning of CPL 450.90 (2) (a).*

Here, the Appellate Division’s reversal of Supreme Court’s order granting suppression, while termed “on the law,” was actually predicated upon a differing view concerning the issue of attenuation, which is a mixed question of law and fact. A reversal *842on a mixed question typically does not meet the requisites of CPL 450.90 (2) (a) (see People v Mayorga, 64 NY2d 864, 865 [1985]…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. HollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. MayorgaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. People v. HintonNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. People v. LawrenceNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. WallgrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. In re Darryl C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. In re Darryl C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. HollandNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. The Matter of Jamal S v. Presentment AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API