Legal Opinion

Scott Heddings v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2011No. DA 10-0055PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Scott Heddings, a self-represented litigant, filed a Petition for Postconviction Relief in the District Court for the Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, alleging that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and that he was subjected to double jeopardy during the trial court proceedings that led to his conviction and sentence for the offense of incest. The District Court denied Heddings’ request for postconviction relief and dismissed his petition. Heddings appealed and we affirm.

¶2 We address the following issue on appeal: Whether the District Court correctly determined…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Whitlow v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. GundersonMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. GuillaumeMontana Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. Harley HowardMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Riggs v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. HaldaneMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Stock v. MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Raul Sanchez v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API