Legal Opinion

McInnes v. Goldthwaite

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 6, 1947No. 3658PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.

The plaintiff William M. McInnes defends the long continuance of his administration as executor on the ground that no demand was made on him for the assets. This position is untenable. It is true that the trustees who were appointed in 1933 must share with the executor the responsibility for the neglect to have the funds transferred to the trust for charitable purposes. Attorney Norton lived until 1937 and Dr. Goldthwaite is a member of the board appearing in the present proceedings. The latter was written April 25,1931, by his fellow trustee that it would probably be nearly a year before the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kohler EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Berner v. Equitable Office Bldg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. State v. Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In re Estate of McCoolSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. Lynch v. John M. Redfield FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API