Pacific Express Co. v. Lasker Real Estate Ass'n
Texas Supreme Court
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
STAYTON, Chief Justice.
This action was brought to recover damages claimed to have resulted from the partial destruction of a house owned by appellee, which it is claimed resulted from the negligence of a servant of appellant while engaged in the conduct of its business. After the action was brought it appears that the cause was removed to a- Circuit Court of the United States, by which it was remanded to the State court, and when called in the latter court for trial during the early part of the term at which it was tried it appears that the evidence that the cause had been remanded was not…
2Cited by36 opinions
- Coastal Transport Co. v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- King v. McGuffTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RoperIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Gilbert Wheeler, Inc. v. Enbridge Pipelines (East Texas), L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
- Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. ZumwaltTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.