Zimmerman v. Miller
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Codd, J. Assumpsit by William Zimmerman against Frank P. Miller for breach of a land contract. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
At a time when the unearned increment of realty values in the village of Highland Park was under active exploitation, plaintiff had an affair in that line with defendant resulting in this litigation, the documentary evidence of which, shorn of defendant’s advertising matter, is as follows:
“Agreement, made this 18th day of November, 1915, between Frank P. Miller, of Detroit, Michigan, representing____party of the first part, and Wm. Zimmerman and wife____Street 109 East Milwaukee, city of Detroit, Mich., parties of the second part:
“Witnesseth: That the party of the first part agrees to sell…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bomier v. CaldwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1841
- Inkster v. CarverMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Lewis v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Nelson v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Meyer v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hinkle v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. VelingMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Soloman v. Western Hills Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Moody v. Home Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Port Investment Co. v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.