Legal Opinion
Mark Gekas v. Peter Vasiliades
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 1, 2016No. 15-1226PublishedCited by 225 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, Mark Gekas (“Ge-kas”), filed suit against several individual members of the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation (hereinafter the “Department”), claiming they retaliated against him in violation of his constitutional First Amendment rights and were liable to him under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Specifically, Gekas sued Peter Vasiliades, Frank Maggio, Mary Ra-nieli, John Lagatutta, 1 and John Krisko (collectively the “Defendants”) for the claimed violations. The Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, which the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Daryl L. Johnson v. Cambridge Industries, Incorporated and Meridian Automotive Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Evans v. PoskonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- George Dawson v. Michael BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by225 opinions
- Edward Tobey v. Brenda ChibucosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Anthony Johnson v. Edward WinsteadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Brian Towne v. Karen DonnellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
- Daniel Rassier v. John SannerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Brown v. DartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
220 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.