Legal Opinion

Carneiro v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 5, 2008No. AC 28417PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WEST, J.

The petitioner, Daniel Cameiro, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly concluded that his trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to object to certain testimony of three witnesses. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The following factual and procedural history is relevant to our disposition of the petitioner’s appeal. On August 31, 2001, the petitioner was convicted, after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Floyd v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. State v. CarneiroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Benitez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  3. Carneiro v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API