Legal Opinion

Martin v. Connor

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShain, P. J.

— In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover against defendants for damages growing out of an alleged sale by plaintiff to defendants of one hundred and ninety-six yearling steers.

The defendants are members of an alleged co-partnership, engaged in the business of buying and selling live stock on commission under the name of John Clay & .Company. '

For cause of action, plaintiff states:

“Comes now the plaintiff, and with leave of court, files this, his amended petition for damages bringing in new parties defendant, and for his cause of actipn states that the defendants Frank IT. Connor, A. F.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. School District v. Phoenix Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  2. Pfotenhauer v. RidgwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  3. Williams v. American Exchange BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Sanzenbacher v. SanthuffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Savage Manufacturing Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grace v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Alford v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API