Legal Opinion

Williams v. American Exchange Bank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

— This action seeks to recover the sum of $2151.99, paid in excess of the principal on a $6000 note and renewals thereof and which plaintiff alleges he was compelled to pay by reason of a usurious transaction.

Tt is alleged that defendant is a banking corporation doing business at the city of Sedalia, Pettis county. Missouri, and that on November 27, 19T6, plaintiff borrowed from defendant the sum of $6000, executing his promissory note therefor, payable on demand, with interest from date at eight per cent per annum; that payments were made on said note from time to time and the remainder of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Missouri v. RagsdaleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Hughes v. FoltzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Wardell v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spangler-Bowers v. BentonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. The University Bank v. MajorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Stewart v. Boone County Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Avery v. Mechanics InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Evans v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API