Legal Opinion

Barham v. Reames

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 1, 1963No. 16387PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENFRO, Justice.

Suit was instituted by plaintiffs Reames, Brothers and Davidson for permanent injunction to prohibit defendants Barham and wife from conducting a beauty parlor business in a building on their lot in violation of certain restrictions, covenants and conditions common to the Addition. Defendants admitted the violation but defended upon the grounds of laches, waiver and abandonment of restrictions.

Plaintiffs’ motion for instructed verdict was overruled and the case was submitted to the jury on the question of waiver by the plaintiffs. The jury was unable to agree, whereupon the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. WelshTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Green v. GernerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Green v. GernerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Plaster v. StutzmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Arrington v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. PerlitzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Davis v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  3. Ortiz v. JeterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Schoenhals v. CloseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Smith v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API