United States v. Milton F. Duvall, III
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
The only question we are left with on this appeal is whether the district court’s order requiring Milton F. Duvall (Duvall), defendant/appellant, to pay $1.7 million in restitution is illegal. We conclude that it is not and we affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Duvall pled guilty to one count of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and one count of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. These crimes were committed by Duvall in the course of operating an investment company. The plea agreement provided that the Government could argue for what it felt was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Karl Lee Phillips v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by16 opinions
- John W. Gall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Gary BennettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. SoderlingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Polen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- United States v. Sharon Sue CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.