Legal Opinion

Warren v. Nolan

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 9, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

Ira Warren appeals from the summary judgment entered by the Superior Court, Knox County, in favor of the defendants James Nolan and Lyndon Abbott on the ground that Warren had not complied with the notice provisions of the Maine Tort Claims Act, 14 M.R.S.A. § 8107 (1980).1 *1135Because we agree with Warren that the record reveals a genuine issue of material fact, we vacate the summary judgment.

In his complaint, Warren identified the defendants as Maine State Police officers, but did not allege that the officers made the claimed defamatory statements in the scope of their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Darling v. Augusta Mental Health InstituteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  2. Finn v. LipmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  3. Peoples Heritage Bank v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mueller v. Penobscot Valley HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  2. Kakitis v. PerrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API