Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 2004No. H025922PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McADAMS, J.

In this appeal we must decide whether a prior conviction for violation of Penal Code section 4221 qualifies as a “strike” under the 2000 amendments to the “Three Strikes” law. We find that it does so qualify and we affirm the judgment.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1998 and 1999, defendant threatened to kill his former girlfriend and her new boyfriend on numerous occasions. He pleaded guilty to violating section 422. At the time, section 422 was not listed as a serious felony under the *76Three Strikes law. Amendments to the Three Strikes law, enacted in 2000 by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. ToledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. People v. Casillas, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Braziel v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. Aguirre, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API