Legal Opinion

Hanks v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1911No. 16,749PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to tlie district court for Dawes county: Wil-liam H. Westover, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.

From a sentence of seven years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary for committing rape, Jerry Hanks, who will be referred to as the accused, has prosecuted a petition in error to this court.

The court did not err in refusing to continue the case. By agreement of the county attorney and counsel for the *466accused, the case had been set for trial on a day certain, and there is no suggestion that the absence of the alleged witnesses was not known to Mr. Hanks or to his counsel at the time that agreement was made, nor is there a sufficient showing of diligence to procure the witnesses for the trial.

Over…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McMath v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Clough v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Murphy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  5. State v. PollardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sundahl v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. State v. HollomanNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. MacAvoy v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Cooper v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API