J.M. v. Minnesota District Council of the Assemblies of God
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
Appellants St. James Assembly of God Church and the Minnesota District Council of the Assemblies of God challenge denial of their motions for summary judgment, contending that the religious freedom clauses of the federal and state constitutions deprive the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction over claims asserted by respondent J.M. for the hiring and retention of a pastor who engaged in a sexual relationship with her during counseling. Because court examination of the council’s and the church’s hiring decisions are precluded by the First Amendment, we…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jones v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Continental Can Co. Ex Rel. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Doe YZ v. Shattuck-St. Mary's SchoolDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2016
- Egan v. Hamline United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004